10 Real Examples of Trademark Infringement
Are you struggling to determine whether your registered trademark has been infringed upon? Understanding what constitutes trademark infringement can be challenging without clear examples. Fortunately, our experienced legal advisors at Trademark Eagle have compiled ten real trademark infringement cases to clarify the complexities involved.
In this article, we’ll explore some of the most well-known trademark lawsuits worldwide. These examples will help you avoid similar pitfalls and better protect your brand or business.
Why Understanding Trademark Infringement Matters
Trademark infringement can significantly impact a business, leading to legal disputes, financial losses, and damage to brand reputation. Knowing these examples equips you with the knowledge to safeguard your trademarks and navigate potential legal challenges.
1. Nestlé vs. Cadbury
In 2018, Nestlé and Cadbury, two giants in the food and beverage industry, clashed over the trademarking of a chocolate bar shape. Cadbury attempted to trademark the shape of Nestlé’s KitKat chocolate bars. However, Nestlé successfully challenged this registration, highlighting the challenges of trademarking a product’s shape.
Key Takeaway: Trademarks can extend beyond logos and names to product shapes and packaging, but such cases are often complex. Shapes can be protected as trademarks if they comply with acceptance criteria under current law – so its worth checking before adopting a shape trademark and also taking steps to register your rights.
2. Apple Corps vs. Apple Inc.
The legal dispute between Apple Corps (a music company) and Apple Inc. (a technology company) was settled in 2007 after a long-running battle over the trademarking of the word ‘apple’ in the music industry context. With the creation of iTunes, Apple Inc. and Apple Corps reached a settlement where Apple Inc. purchased certain trademark rights from Apple Corps and licensed them back.
Key Takeaway: Even seemingly unrelated industries can face trademark conflicts if similar names are involved and the owners have a reputation and goodwill associated with their brand, emphasizing the importance of thorough trademark research.
3. WWF vs. WWF
Confusion arose when two companies shared the acronym ‘WWF.’ The World Wildlife Fund took legal action against the wrestling company Titan Sports after it renamed itself the World Wrestling Federation (WWF). The decade-long battle concluded with the World Wildlife Fund winning, leading to the wrestling company rebranding as World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE).
Key Takeaway: Trademark conflicts often arise when two entities use identical or similar acronyms, including in different industries where the earlier right is established and well known.
4. Lidl vs. Tesco
In a battle of supermarkets, Lidl emerged victorious over Tesco in a trademark infringement case. The dispute arose from Tesco’s use of a symbol similar to Lidl’s logo in its Clubcard prices promotion. Evidence showed that Tesco’s internal team was aware of these similarities, leading the judge to rule in favour of Lidl.
Key Takeaway: Similarities in branding elements like logos can lead to legal disputes, so it’s crucial to ensure distinct branding and to avoid using elements of other trademarks.
5. Starbucks vs. Sambucks
In 2005, Starbucks sued Sam Lundberg for trademark infringement over her Oregon-based coffeehouse, Sambucks. Despite being a small business, the similarity in naming posed a threat to Starbucks, leading to legal action. Starbucks has also pursued legal action against other businesses with similar names, such as Haidbucks Coffee and Starbock Beer.
Key Takeaway: Large corporations often take legal action to protect their brand identity, even against smaller businesses with similar names.
6. L’Oreal vs. Bellure
In 2010, L’Oreal sued Bellure for trademark infringement due to Bellure’s marketing comparisons between its fragrances and L’Oreal’s products. L’Oreal won, as Bellure was found to gain an unfair advantage by using comparisons to L’Oreal’s brand.
Key Takeaway: Comparative advertising can lead to trademark disputes, especially when a brand’s reputation is used to sell competing products.
7. Specsavers vs. Asda
Specsavers triumphed over Asda in a trademark battle regarding the use of a similar optical services logo. Asda’s campaign slogans like “BE A REAL SPEC SAVER AT ASDA” contributed to the infringement. The distinctiveness of Specsavers’s logo and brand name led to a favorable ruling.
Key Takeaway: Protecting brand identity through distinctive logos and slogans is vital, as similar branding can result in infringement claims.
8. Louis Vuitton vs. Louis Vuiton Dak
Louis Vuitton, a luxury fashion house, sued South Korean fried chicken restaurant Louis Vuiton Dak for international trademark infringement. Despite operating in different industries, the restaurant used a name, logo, and packaging similar to Louis Vuitton’s. After changing its name to ‘LOUISVUI TONDAK’ post-ruling, the restaurant was fined for non-compliance.
Key Takeaway: Even businesses in unrelated industries can face trademark disputes if they use similar names and branding elements to a well-known trademark.
9. Academy of Motion Picture Arts vs. GoDaddy.com Inc.
Unlike typical trademark infringement cases, this dispute involved domain names. The Academy Awards claimed that 57 domain names offered by GoDaddy were confusingly similar to its trademarks. Despite a lengthy legal battle, the judge ruled in favor of GoDaddy, citing a lack of intent to profit from these domain sales.
Key Takeaway: Domain names can lead to trademark disputes, but intent and context can play significant roles in legal outcomes.
10. 3M vs. 3N
3M successfully sued Changzhou Huawei Advanced Material Co Ltd for using the name 3N. Although there were differences in products and pricing, 3M’s reputation and distinctive mark led to a ruling of trademark infringement against 3N.
Key Takeaway: Similarity in names can lead to infringement claims, especially when one brand has established their brand and has a strong market presence.
Protect Your Brand with Trademark Eagle
Whether you’re concerned about someone infringing on your trademark rights or you’ve been accused of unintentional trademark infringement, seeking professional legal advice is crucial. At Trademark Eagle, we have a department dedicated to dealing with trademark disputes and in addition to registering your brand we offer comprehensive services to help you with trademark research and protection.
Our trademark monitoring service is essential for identifying and addressing potential infringements quickly. By monitoring national and international trademark applications, we help safeguard your brand from damaging conflicts.
If negotiations don’t resolve disputes, we can assist in formal legal proceedings at the Registry to protect your rights. Don’t wait for issues to arise; take proactive steps to secure your brand’s future.
Contact Us Today
Interested in learning more about the trademark dispute process? Contact our expert legal team for support in avoiding or resolving trademark infringement.
Arrange your free initial consultation:
- Call: 0122 3208 624
- Email: enquiries@trademark-eagle.com
- Online Contact Form: Visit Our Website
- Live Chat: Available on our website
Ensure your brand’s protection with Trademark Eagle – your trusted partner in trademark law.
